Men who wanted to be left Alone

 The most terrifying force of death, comes from the hands of "Men who wanted to be left Alone".

They try, so very hard, to mind their own business and provide for themselves and those they love. They resist every impulse to fight back, knowing the forced and permanent change of life that will come from it. They know, that the moment they fight back, their lives as they have lived them, are over. The moment the "Men who wanted to be left Alone" are forced to fight back, it is a form of suicide. They are literally killing off who they used to be. . . . Which is why, when forced to take up violence, these "Men who wanted to be left Alone", fight with unholy vengeance against those who murdered their former lives. They fight with raw hate, and a drive that cannot be fathomed by those who are merely play-acting at politics and terror. TRUE TERROR will arrive at these people's door, and they will cry, scream, and beg for mercy . . . . but it will fall upon the deaf ears of the "Men who just wanted to be left alone." Author Unkown

Artin

 Artn said, where was I

You were a sparkle in my eye

A twinkle in the sky

SIlently Screaming

 Two video comments that sum up some of my views very nicely:

• @SilentlyScreaming

  We are experiencing... E-madness? A mass delusion passed person to person thru the 21st century technologies like social media, corporate media, TV and other electronic mediums. Its so strange, as one who wont let a TV in my home, to see the difference between what my eyes see, and what many people say is happening.
  The million dollar question- Is it even possible to pull back at this point?
• 
  

@SoundChaser

...First you build a Pleasure Park, strong and all encompassing as a maximum security prison. Invite all the people to come in and play. Then, when all are busy bathing in self absorption, one might turn the key...





They came from a DarkHorse Podcast on Odysee video sharing platform.

Ecstasy may damage the brain's physical defences

 Very old article I read(2005) that I re-found this morning. I read something about the mRNA Covid vaccine being able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and that reminded me of this past article.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8314-ecstasy-may-damage-the-brains-physical-defences/

"he brain is protected by a fence of tightly packed cells, called the blood-brain barrier. This prevents all but the smallest molecules from passing through. But the new experiments show that MDMA – the chemical name for ecstasy, or “E” – somehow forces open that barrier, allowing larger molecules access to the brain.

Bryan Yamamoto at Boston University, US, and colleagues gave rats four doses of MDMA over 8 hours. “We were trying to approximate a human dosaging pattern,” says Yamamoto. The scientists also injected a blue dye, made of molecules too large to get into the rats’ brains under normal circumstances.

One day later, the researchers found the dye had made its way into parts of the brain, such as the caudate and the hippocampus. Ten weeks later, despite no further doses of MDMA being given, new injections of dye were still passing through the blood brain barrier."

Read more: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn8314-ecstasy-may-damage-the-brains-physical-defences/#ixzz73QXjCtHC

 

Here is some info I found elsewhere on the internet regarding the mRNA vaccine:

 

" First of all, up until this point there has never been a successful vaccine for coronaviruses in humans due to a problem typical of coronavirus vaccine development called antibody dependent enhancement or ADE.[1] In preliminary animal trials for previous coronavirus vaccines (SARS and MERS), animals were vaccinated and seemed to exhibit a robust antibody response, but upon exposure to the wild virus, they developed a paradoxical immune enhancement leading to severe organ inflammation (especially lungs), and many died.[2][3][61][63][64][65] Paradoxical immune response in respiratory virus vaccines has also taken place in human trials, which occurred during testing of the failed RSV vaccines of the 1960s.[4][69] Alarmingly, there are some statistical indications of ADE in covid vaccine trials, but there is no way to know for sure because many key signifiers of ADE weren’t specifically addressed.[5][66][67] Due to emergency protocol, the usual method of testing animals prior to humans was bypassed, limited animal testing occurred in parallel with humans, and the potential for ADE was not comprehensively assessed.[6][7][54] Historical precedent would suggest, however, that ADE is a distinct possibility, and we may not know the true negative effects until years from now when vaccinated persons are exposed to SARS-CoV-2 or genetically similar versions of coronavirus.[8][62][68][70] Second, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines contain lipid nanoparticles that are “PEGylated”, meaning the nanoparticles are coated with PEG (polyethylene glycol). [9] PEGs can lead to life threatening anaphylaxis or other conditions such as thrombocytopenia.[10][50] Such reactions are already occurring during the initial rollout and PEGs are the most likely culprit.[11] Approximately 72% of the US population have PEG antibodies, with 8% having highly elevated levels (more than 500 ng/mL), putting them at risk for severe allergic reaction and/or future autoimmune disorders.[12] These reactions were totally predictable, with many experts warning of the danger posed by PEGs[13][14][15][55], yet participants with a history of severe allergic reaction were excluded from the trials, serving to obscure the actual negative impact PEGs will have now that these injections are being given to members of the public who have not been screened for PEG antibodies.[16][53] Also, there is some worrying evidence to suggest that PEGs cross the blood-brain barrier and accumulate in the brain, possibly causing inflammation and/or autoimmune conditions, a fact gleaned from previous animal studies on mRNA vaccines. PEGs were found to be distributed across a spectrum of tissues including the brain.[52] Additionally, nanoparticles (such as PEGylated hydrogel) are known components for state of the art medical interventions, including biosurveillance technology currently being developed by DARPA and companies like Profusa Inc.[17][18][19][20][21] The secretive nature of this technology necessitates a knowledge gap between developers and the general public, so although my research efforts have yet to verify a direct functional relationship between PEGylated nanoparticles used in covid injections and biosurveillance, I personally do not relish the prospect of being injected with such given their association with biosurveillance technology of the military industrial complex. Third, it is impossible to ascertain long term safety because of the foreshortened timeframe of Operation Warp Speed.[22] Vaccines should be tested for multiple years to adequately assess their longterm effects.[23] Short term safety is questionable too, as much of the data are still unavailable, and the current reports on safety and efficacy essentially amount to self-reported press releases from these companies themselves.[24] Fourth, the efficacy number of 90% for Pfizer and 94% for Moderna is statistically misleading, reporting a relative reduction instead of absolute reduction of risk*. Also, the trials only assessed these vaccines’ ability to prevent mild symptoms and NOT their ability to prevent transmission.[25] If they don’t prevent people from transmitting the virus (especially when safer, cheaper drugs like Ivermectin do) [26][27][58] what’s the point? Fifth, these are NOT vaccines in the normal sense. They are mRNA vaccines, which utilize a completely different process for achieving disease protection**; mRNA vaccines seek to introduce synthetic messenger RNA into the body in order to “trick” cells into producing immunogens, which then stimulate an immune response.[28] These vaccines are the first of their kind ever to gain authorization.[29] Current vaccinations are essentially an extension of phase 3 of the trials.[30] Because of the lack of long term safety assessment and the new nature of this technology, people are participating in a mass human experiment with no way of knowing the long term health effects these could cause. Many problems from vaccines are known to have an incubatory period and do not manifest until much later, which is why testing needs to occur for multiple years in order to adequately assess risk. [31] One such problem currently being discussed is the mRNA technology’s possible impact on female fertility, as it encourages the production of antibodies against a laboratory stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that contains a very similar protein crucial for the development of placenta called syncytin-1. This could interfere with the reproductive process by encouraging the immune system to react against syncytin-1, thereby disrupting placental development.[32][71] The vaccines’ impact on fertility is currently unknown as animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed.[33] Sixth, there was a signature for many different problems seen in the various trials and initial rollout for these vaccines, problems that are concurrent with commonly documented vaccine injuries. Injuries reported in the various trials/rollout have included, but are not limited to, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, transverse myelitis, multi-system inflammatory syndrome, flash pulmonary edema, miscarriage, dyskinesia, myalgic encephalomyelitis, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, and death. [34][35][36][37][50][51][56][59] Seventh, and perhaps most importantly, the movement toward potential vaccine mandates or other coercive policies violates humanity’s most universally accepted principles of human rights and medical ethics, especially for a medical intervention with so many known and unknown safety/efficacy concerns. The absolute bedrock of medical ethics is the right to informed consent, as individuals must be made fully aware of all the potential benefits and risks associated with a medical intervention, while still maintaining the right to decline that intervention should they so choose.[41] Mandates or coercive measures fundamentally violate historical safeguards humanity has put in place to protect us from the ever present threat of medical tyranny, including the Nuremberg Code, the United Nations’ International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and UNESCO’s Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.[42][43][49] Such would also be in violation of the Hippocratic Oath, for not only do oath keepers pledge first to do no harm, but also to treat the needs of the patient.[44] This implies that a doctor’s duty primarily pertains to the needs of the individual before the needs of the collective, a vital distinction made by Hippocrates and understood for nearly 2 millennia.[45][46] Privileging the needs of the collective is a “fallacy of misplaced concreteness”.[47] While individual need is directly apprehensible and consensual, collective need is an abstract, subjective concept not easily defined. And yet who usually gets to define this concept? Such is most often defined by those in power with the most means to influence institutional narratives, turning medical professionals who treat the needs of the collective according to this definition into mere extensions of that power at the expense of individual informed consent. * Regarding the reporting on the reduction of relative risk instead of absolute risk, in the phase 3 trial of the Pfizer vaccine, for example, 22,000 people were vaccinated and 22,000 were given placebo, for a total of 44,000 trial participants. Of those 44,000, just 170 were clinically diagnosed as having covid-19 post-vaccination. Of those 170, it was reported that 8 received the vaccine and 162 received the placebo. From this ratio it was inferred that the vaccine would prevent 154 out of 162 from getting the disease for an efficacy of greater than 90%. But even as the British Medical Journal explained, “A relative risk reduction is being reported, not absolute risk reduction, which appears to be less than 1%.”[39] The supposed sterling efficacy touted by both Pfizer and Moderna are great for instilling confidence in their product, yet they were based on figures derived from only a small fraction of trial participants (just 0.38% of total participants in the Pfizer trial, and the same misleading statistical reporting seen in the Moderna trial as well).[40] ** Labeling the mRNA technology employed by Pfizer and Moderna a “vaccine” stretches the term’s definition beyond reasonable limits. Although it is claimed that such an intervention fulfills the purpose of vaccination by encouraging antibodies against an infectious disease, such does not contain any attenuated biologics typical of traditional vaccination, nor has it been proven to prevent infection, transmission, or community circulation; it may be more accurate, therefore, to label such as a “synthetic pathogen delivery device” constituting a form of “gene therapy”.[57] Links at pastebin dot com /qTZB6D5h"

Online Yoga vs Social Media

I have been trying to remove myself from big tech social media platforms lately. As an individual it feels insignificant, but if we all stopped supporting Big Tech and Big Corporations they would cease to exist, and it has to start somewhere.

I deleted my facebook for a second time. I've uninstalled Whatsapp and Instagram. And I've uploaded my entire Youtube library to Odysee.com

Odysee.com is an alternative to youtube that isn't owned by any corporation. Here is a brief description:

 

Odysee, a video website built by LBRY, Inc. using their LBRY protocol, entered beta in September 2020 and officially launched that December. As of December 2020, 400,000 people had posted 5 million videos on Odysee, and the site had 8.7 million monthly active users.

 

 

Another site that is a competitor of facebook is called Gab.com. They have their own servers so can't be shut down or censored by big tech server owners like Amazon. 

We have just recently moved to an apartment in Penticton BC so I have been posting less online Yoga videos, but now that we are getting settled I will be posting more often.

Please check out my Yoga classes at www.youtube.com/roham or www.odysee.com/@roham

I try to stream live 3 times a week but currently cant guarantee any

Lots of love and hope to see you on your mat.

We The Forrest

 "So you want to push us around a little bit? 🤔😏 Do you realize what happens when strong winds blow through a forest? Their roots will grow stronger..... So the more you push us around the more stable we will get. The more you try to frighten us the more fun we will have. The more hate you spread the more loving and inclusive we'll become. For you this might just be a game. For us it will be just another a free training program without the monthly fee's and trips to the gym. Take away our money. We will create our own. Take away our food. We will grow our own. Cripple the internet. We will build our own networks. Take away or harm our children ever again... We will crush you like ants... Humanity is on the rise and our unity and consciousness will push us to ever higher levels. Day in day out. Our lights will burn so bright that there won't be a shadow left to hide. Our love so intense, it will make you kneel down before us..... We are coming for you all! Together we will rise! 🔥❤️🙏..."

-unknown

Minimum of what everybody needs to read before they can converse intelligently

 Here is Robert Anton Wilson's recommended book list, as taken from the Books section of the official Web site. Again, Wilson says, "Not the 'best' or even my favorites, exactly: Just the bare minimum of what everybody needs to chew and digest before they can converse intelligently about the 21st Century.

 

 

1. THE MASS PSYCHOLOGY OF FASCISM, Wilhelm Reich.

2. ULYSSES, James Joyce.

3. FINNEGAN'S WAKE, James Joyce.

4. THE CANTOS, Ezra Pound.

5. MACHINE ART, Ezra Pound.

6. SELECTED PROSE, Ezra Pound.

7. HARLOT'S GHOST, Norman Mailer.

8. GO DOWN, MOSES, William Faulkner.

9. THE ALPHABET VS. THE GODDESS, Leonard Shlain.

10. THE OPEN SOCIETY AND ITS ENEMIES, Karl Popper (two volumes).

11. CONFUCIUS: THE GREAT DIGEST, THE UNWOBBLING PIVOT, THE ANALECTS, translated by Ezra Pound.

12. THE ANTI-CHRIST, Friedrich Nietzsche.

13. CHAOS AND CYBERCULTURE, Timothy Leary, Ph.D.

14. CRITICAL PATH, R. Buckminster Fuller.

15. INSTEAD OF A BOOK, Benjamin Tucker.

16. DIGITAL McLUHAN, Paul Levinson.

17. SAHARASIA, James DeMeo, Ph.D.

18. SCIENCE AND SANITY, Alfred Korzybski.

19. PROGRESS AND POVERTY, Henry George.

20. THE NATURAL ECONOMIC ORDER, Silvio Gesell.

Found here:

http://www.rawillumination.net/2010/09/raws-recommended-reading-list-following.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Anton_Wilson

I wanted to add that I haven't read these books yet but decided publishing them will insure I have the list at my disposal later.